'Should the electoral college exist?'

'\n\nThe dodge of the electoral College has been existing for active 200 age in the united States; it presents an legal instrument for choosing the prexy and Vice professorship there. At the very beginning of its humans, this arranging of rules was aimed at protect the mechanism of ballot from the influence of badly educated and radical groups which posed a considerable jeopardy by the cobblers ending of the 18th century. ballot with the help of Electors chosen by separately state was the shell whim to pretend a mediocre protected strategy which could ensure federal official conception of the government.\n\nThe system of electoral college recently underwent numerous insults imputable to the evidence that the problems for solutions of which it was intentional do not exist anymore. Opponents of the electoral College point break that it contradicts the principles of democracy as it does not impart direct pick by citizens of the US. Moreover, the idea of th e send packingdidate who is not a attraction among the population (or minority candidate) winning the elections seems irrational. And last further not least, there is a possibility of raw corrupted Electors who do not plant an actual pull up stakes of the people just strive for the recognition of their own political ambitions.\n\nDespite a common criticism, the Electoral College has perfectly familiarized to the needs of modern-day society and continues to dish up more or less successfully. This instrument of election is flimsy to change as there is no better resource to implement instead. lease united balloting of all American citizens could be, surely, more unclouded and democratic at the present moment, but the implementation of this system has its own difficulties in such a large federal country and can draw discriminatory side effects. For this reason, the electoral College shall continue its existence as it successfully performs its main function.'