'Personality Analysis Essay\r'

'How Personality Affects Situational Behavior\r\nRelative to encyclopedism supposition; charitable fashion is associated with cognitive and environmental factors (Feist &type A; Feist, 2009). Bandura (1997) self-efficacy theory supposes a mortal’s idiosyncratic(a) cognition on if a particular depute could be achieved and mould a soul’s aptitude to achieve. Bandura deemed the power of face-to-face efficacy profoundly has an effect a somebody’s reaction in a particular circumstance. Conversely, even supposing an requisite influence; it is not, the sole influence on behavior. Personal expectations, previous behavior, in valet de chambreitarian to the environment play a manipulation in what causes behavior (Feist & antiophthalmic factor; Feist, 2009).\r\nPresupposition of the behaviouristic breeding theory, souls obtain accomplishment by experimenting with alternatives; respective(prenominal)s evaluate diverse behaviors until they connect with a special(prenominal) behavior. Learning theory considers globe pertain past well-read randomness as a process to acquiring particular expectation and common principles in related circumstances (Feist & group A; Feist, 2009). An individual reviews similar experiences before generating behavior in a new circumstance this method acting determines the best action and selects one that leave alone suggest a related bequeath (Feist & international international deoxyadenosine monophosphateereere; Feist, 2009). It has been open up in few theories; the learner is unreceptive and basically reacts to environmental motivation. Cognitive discipline theory supposes individuals atomic number 18 sympathetic logical beings, thus individual behavior is established as a result of conception growth.\r\nPersonality theories stalking from an array of educations; manipulations, effects, and some(prenominal) other aspects. The prove of spirit theories began with several prominent theoris ts, Jung, Freud, Klein, and Erikson, and many others. The similarity of influences and the emergence of genius on behavior remain in psychology today. An individual’s characteristic traits and record is the combination to one’s uniqueness. The development method of in the flesh(predicate)ity transpires with environmental factors, heredity, life experiences, and behavioral changes. The relationship amongst soulfulnessality and behavior derive from the inborn work of the unconscious use up (Feist & Feist, 2009).\r\nHumanism is a standard flak that considers learning is applied as an individual process to accomplish a person’s individual capability (Feist & Feist, 2009). In humanistic theory, individual learners scram an affecting and cognitive necessity; this reaction go out motivate a solution to a condition (Feist & Feist, 2009). done a learners encouraging environment, when faced with a touch, an individual will learn and suffice a ppositely. Through a humanistic stand, a response to a particular situation is directed to an individual’s genuine needs and fulfillment. The ultimate response of the individual is in a way upstanding to the fulfillment of current or draw a bead on needs (Feist & Feist, 2009).\r\nA behaviorist perception of constitution is far from specific and accurate. Several theorists consider that even though personality is to some extent foreseeable, a fraction of it is contradictory because of the self-determination inside all of us, whereas individuals respond outside of that which is predictable. For example, you whitethorn find a person that is pretty stable and unemotional who is all of a sudden confronted with a\r\ntrauma or tragedy, such as being go steady or victim to a tough crime or the tragic going of a recognized one. This may jaunt aspects of their personality such as peak anger and violence.\r\nPersonality Characteristics within the Perspectives\r\nThe lear ning theories support that personality is an accretion of learned tendencies that carry on all done the existence. mule driver considered patrimonials is a authoritative contribution in personality development and unique personality’s stems from genetic variance; the ultimate factor of plastic the personality is environmental (Feist & Feist, 2009). Skinner also supposed a person’s environment and personal strong-arm strength in relative to animals help with influencing the common personality of human beings; just social environmental factors influences and fabricates distinctive personality traits. Skinner stated personality as â€Å"at best a repertoire of behavior imparted by an organized garment of contingencies” (Skinner, 1974, as cited by Feist & Feist, 2009).\r\nAccording to the theory of Bandura, he believed human nature as â€Å"proactive, self- organizing, self-regulating, and self-reflective” (Feist & Feist, 2009). Bandura established observational learning allows individuals to learn innocuous of performing behavior. In addition, Bandura supposed â€Å"learning theories atomic number 18 considered for accepting individual intelligence, differences, genetic factors or the whole realm of personality” (Feist & Feist, 2009). Humanistic psychology beliefs are determined towards the biologic drive regarding personal development, despite of environmental factors; people freely make their own choices (Boeree, 1997).\r\nFree will is a significant origin in personality development. Self-actualization is a dominant decision for the conception of the personality (Boeree, 1997). Humanism declares individuals create preference and aggressively contribute in the creation of their own personalities. Maslow supposed biological factors supplied the native factor for the individual; though, heathen and environmental have an effect on shaping the self-image characteristics or personality (Feist & F eist, 2009). Rogers ac noesisd self-awareness, and this consciousness allowed individuals to create preferences and share in creating their own\r\nunique personalities (Boeree, 1997).\r\ninterpersonal Relations\r\nAccording to the humanist/ existential viewpoint, Abraham Maslow theory involved satisfying love and acceptance was a primary need and must be fulfilled by establishing family, friendships, romantic relationships, and sustaining other personal relationships. Maslow intercommunicate contentment at this stage was essential for other stages of the contentment of humans (Feist & Feist, 2009). Carl Rogers’s philosophy involved a child who had a parent or caregiver that had a positive chase for the child encouraged positive mental growth.\r\nPositive affection from others is essential for reasoning(a) development and success toward self-actualization (Boeree, 1997). The common viewpoint of humanism and existentialism observed interpersonal relationships as a ess ential grapheme of human life, without these interpersonal relationships, growth and development may not be psychologically beneficial (Hoffman, 2004). According to Feist & Feist, (2009), Maslow alleged people content in interpersonal relationships have self-confidence in social affairs and have the knowledge and understanding of how to love.\r\nIn a learning perspective, interpersonal relationships are built on shaped behaviors. For example if you smiled at a person, the person will smile rear end at you, then say I love animals and they smile leading some(prenominal) parties talking to a greater extent about animals and escalate those important aspects of the individuals personality that are socially related to conversations about animals. Essentially, the interactions that a person demonstrates to others as a part of their personality are adaptations to the needs of the environment. Basically, learning theory states that the environment dictates those aspects of personalit y that surface in our interactions.\r\nConclusion\r\nPersonality stems from learning theories which defines human learning and its consequential behavior and is created from environmental factors with\r\nsome upcountry aspects, while humanistic theory supposes in a great inclination for internal human drive toward an essential human state of self that is ascertained. The distinct viewpoint with regard to the influence of personalities on particular behavior, the unique definition of human nature and personality, and the distinct clearing of interpersonal associations all represent a distinctive perception of humanity through psychological thought and relevance.\r\nEssentially, personality, though an dainty guide to what may happen, is highly influenced by outside factors, external threats and even internal traumas that emerge from our past. Therefore, situational behavior can be explained through a much more complex understanding of human behavior than traits and factors and in stead seems to be made up of a complex interaction of our society, genetics, family and culture.\r\n parts\r\nBandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The manipulation of control. new(a) York: Freeman.\r\nBoeree, C. G. (1997). Carl Rogers. My Webspace Files. Retrieved April 27, 2011, from http://webspace.ship.edu/cgboer/rogers\r\nColman, A. M. (Ed.). (2010). Humanistic psychology. In Oxford Reference Online. Retrieved May 7, 2011, from http://www.oxfordreference.com Feist, J. & Feist, G. J. (2009). Theories of personality (7th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.\r\nHoffman, L. (2004). Existential therapy. Existential Therapy Homepage. Retrieved May 08, 2011, from http://www.existential-therapy.com\r\n'