Abbreviated Qualitative Research Plan Essay

IntroductionLaws governing the administration of maternal(p) processes, vary from state to state within the United States. The U.S. court dodge allows states to enforce paternal sanctions even after they have been definitively determined that a man is not the biological initiate of the babe. (Brott. 2008) Currently, these irregularities regarding composition create rank injustices such as, men who, through DNA footraceing, have been proven not to be the biological father of the child, still beingness force to redress child support even to the extent of being at move of imprisonment should the accuse fail to maintain monetary support. Because of the monetary luck of authorship cases, low income men atomic number 18 at a great risk of experience catastrophic life-circumstances as a result of composition bilgewater. Because of the inconsistency of the varying laws governing paternal support in apiece state, low-income families with already scarce resources are faced w ith instances of caring and providing for a child (believing them to be a blood relative) only to find out posterior that the child was not related.See more Social process essayThe disparities in the U.S. court system regarding writing of low-income individuals has extreme effects on whether children would ever know their fathers, but they also lead to men being involuntarily held financially or legally responsible for(p) for children they did not biologically father a burden that has disproportionate blackball effects on a man with low-income. Dr. Vincent Miller contends Nearly 30% of the tested paternity cases in our laboratory result in an exclusion of the alleged father presented as the biological father. (2010). The mere allegation of a mans paternity, results in the U.S. court system entering financially, as well as criminally binding judgments. Once caught up in the system, a falsely accused man faces a systemic dismantling of his freedom, creditability, and emotiona l stability. brusk Hatley was recently released from jail after serving time for owing prickle child support for a child that was later proven by DNA testing not to be his. (8/11/09). http//www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/08/11/georgia.child.support/index.html. Currently, on that point are no studies that assess the recovery process of a victim of paternity fraud. After a year in jail, what becomes of a mans employment, family, finances, or mentality? Purpose StatementThis is a qualitative study that will examine the avenues for relief after experiencing the come to of paternity (Creswell. 2009). Research QuestionsIs the U.S. Court system equipped to make tout ensemble a victim of paternity fraud? What are the positive and negative effects of current inconsistent state laws as experienced by the victims of paternity fraud? How do current laws influence the intent to set up fraud?How do current laws encourage the state to abet paternity fraud rather than correcting the results of patern ity fraud? How do current laws result to a culture of unfairness with regard to non-custodial paternal-sanctions? Would standardization of DNA writing testing prevent unfair penalties? Would standardization of DNA paternity testing improve medical history reliability? Could definitive DNA test results provide the basis for legal relief to a man held responsible for a fathering a child in error? What steps must(prenominal) a victim take to seek recovery through the courts What are the costs involved in contesting an incorrect paternity decision? ar there any incentives for the mother to seek correction?Are there any penalties levied on the false accuser?Literature ReviewAnnotated BibliographyBrott, A. (2008, Jul 27). Paternity fraud common. Sun Journal. Retrieved from http//search.proquest.com/docview/378934753?accountid=14872 Child support, money, emotions, and victims of paternity fraud New survey. (2009, Sep 23). PR Newswire. Retrieved from http//search.proquest.com/docvi ew/447485536?accountid=14872 CHRI, S. Q. (2001, May 16). As DNA tests rule out paternity, men work to stop support payments. The Atlanta Constitution. Retrieved from http//search.proquest.com/docview/413895636?accountid=14872 Courts ignore paternity fraud. (2007, Dec 12). The Berkshire Eagle. Retrieved from http//search.proquest.com/docview/379923439?accountid=14872 stupefy takes DNA paternity fraud case to U.S. supreme court. (2002, May 31). U.S.Newswire. Retrieved from http//search.proquest.com/docview/450942550?accountid=14872 Leeds, T. L. (2005). Paternity fraud, the poor persons adoption and the interests of the child. American Journal of Family Law, 19(1), 20-24. Retrieved from http//search.proquest.com/docview/275150869?accountid=14872 compulsory DNA testing would protect a elaborationst paternity fraud. (2001, Feb 28). Washington Times. Retrieved from http//search.proquest.com/docview/409646680?accountid=14872 Research castThe participants of this study will be selected from low-income men actively contesting paternity in U.S. courts as well as custodial parents in order to gain the negative analysis of the phenomenon. (Lincoln & angstrom unit Guba. 1985) The natural reach will be litigants within the State Courts system involved with matter of Paternity. (Lincoln & Guba. 1985) This setting will be relevant to the phenomenon being studied. (Smeaton. 2008) Information will be collected through focus group interviews and surveys. Participants will be pursue via open ended questions regarding their experience. (Sarkar. 2014) The instruments used to measure outcomes will be the investigator who will inquire of the respondents. Researcher will ensure to guard once against individualised bias. (Sarkar. 2014) Research will consist of prolonged engagement to glean excess insight into whether participants in a paternity contest can again regain equilibrium within their lives. (Lincoln & Guba. 1985) Threats to validity will be selection, candor (e xistence of undisclosed extenuating circumstances), instability of respondents cause difficulty in locating them at regular reporting intervals. The results will allow recommendations to be made to improve the paternity process, based on analysis of the selective information collected.ReferencesBiotechnology DNA technology roots out paternity fraud. (2010). smell Science Weekly, , 287. Retrieved from http//search.proquest.com/docview/746790449?accountid=14872 Child support, money, emotions, and victims of paternity fraud New survey. (2009, Sep 23). PR Newswire. Retrieved from http//search.proquest.com/docview/447485536?accountid=14872 Courts ignore paternity fraud. (2007, Dec 12). The Berkshire Eagle. Retrieved from http//search.proquest.com/docview/379923439?accountid=14872 Creswell, J. (2009). Research design Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (Laureate Education, Inc., customs Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA Sage Publications Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Pro ducer). (2008). Quantitative methods, an example. Baltimore AuthorLincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Thousand Oaks CA. Sage. Mandatory DNA testing would protect against paternity fraud. (2001, Feb 28). Washington Times.Retrieved from http//search.proquest.com/docview/409646680?accountid=14872 Sreeroopa, S. (2014). Qualitative research methods. Media Retrieved from Laureate Education, Inc.